ruth dealy


The word “shadow” has layered meanings for Ruth Dealy. The artist’s stated aim is to paint directly from her eye to her hand, ‘without the shadow of editorial opinion falling in between’. Contrary to its traditional metaphorical association with light— with something that elucidates —in Dealy’s conception, reason obscures; it makes things murky.

Her work involves an act of negation: to preempt the emergence of judgment, with its attendant baggage of doubt and insecurity, and everything that one must unlearn to see the world for what it is. Negation here is an active process, a struggle to be waged so that the fragile drive of intuition may yield something like a sense of clarity.” Throughout her life, Dealy has vied desperately with a different kind of shadow.

As a child, she lost vision in her right eye from rheumatoid arthritis. Years later, she developed glaucoma in her other eye and was forced to face in slow motion the terrifying prospect of total blindness. The works from this year-long period of impending sightlessness resonate with undiluted fear. The self-portraits, in particular, evoke the point at which fear becomes something else, something grotesque, deformed; something animal. It is not exactly anger that they display. Their marks are the flagellations of someone drowning, gasping for air, clawing her way back to the surface.

The landscapes that Dealy created in that dark place evoke a different effect. They are more lyrical, their components fading in and out of view while establishing a kind of harmony. They vibrate, as if hovering between two worlds. The unseen presence who wanders lost through those melancholy woods seems captivated by their beauty, attempting to make peace, perhaps, with the possibility that it may soon be lost to her forever.

Many years and numerous surgeries later, Dealy continues to produce disarming images, and her work continues to evolve. What remains constant is the sense that she understands, surely better than most, that the psychological experience of seeing is inextricably intertwined with the body and its dynamic connection to the world — what the philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty termed the ontology of the flesh.

Perception is carnal, and the body is of the world. And so, for each one of us, our view is not on the world, but rather in it. It may be true that it is the soul that sees, and not the eye, as René Descartes famously asserted. But even so, as Dealy’s work reminds us, it is only our embodiment within the world that keeps the shadows at bay.

René Morales, Curator, Pérez Art Museum Miami

Previous
Previous

sharon cutts

Next
Next

deborah forman